A European Banking Puppet
Update: January 8, 2023
Disclaimer: Regardless of your religious view or view on religion... regardless of your political views or opinions, as you read the following consider religious and political institutions upon the basis of business engagement. Whereas, in regard to religion, or religious belief, upon which modern politics are built [America (USA): Judeo-Christian principles] by means of defining the human concept and belief in existence and origin thereof, religion operates as a business. Collecting fees and gifts to operate its negotiations (ie: buildings / missions) pan-globally. Walk into most any town and you will find two principle buildings as center: bank and church. School and administration buildings are of the others. And (consider) during war-time, that business (religion) stays neutral because it represents “God”. Yet, the war is likely being fought because of someone else's definition and interpretation of it (God). Therefore, for instance, think of Switzerland and the Vatican… as examples, in Europe. In this relation, The Battle of The Alamo is very much a reflection of protestant counter-reformation in The New World that spread from Europe, up through Mexico, down from New England - and two opposing philosophies collided - at The Alamo. Yet, did a stealth (hidden) influence manipulate the opposing philosophies and dominate the outcome regardless?
AMERICA: A European Banking Puppet
No American should put their religion or organizational faith ahead of their country regarding political decision.
Can a religious philosophy however, persuade mass theoretical thinking and decision making?
In 2021, I wrote a letter to every American politician. It circulated broadly. I continue to circulate it.
America: you are a European banking puppet. Think not? Look at your National Debt. $30+T and counting - this is a result of your naivety to allow the Military Industrial Complex (see: Eisenhower) to be used against your best interest as a free Constitutional Republic and be used to progress the United Nations' agenda.
Whether you are Democrat or Republican - or of other affiliation. Whether the issue be immigration, education, civil rights, racial discourse, federal debt ceiling, misuse of Federal agencies or voting integrity - Today, the United States is more polarized politically than it has ever been.
We have just witnessed the longest impasse in Congress to elect a Speaker since before the Civil War. The 118th Congress required very key GOP negotiations for McCarthy to be elected and for Congress to commence. I understand these issues included various commitments to agenda items driven by the House Freedom Caucus - these include "motion to vacate", seat guarantees and government agency investigations (ie: FBI).
Furthermore, for the first time (Aug 8, 2022) in the country's short history, a Federal organization was used to invade a former US President's personal residence (Mar-a-Lago). Who's not trusting who in DC? Regardless of your political affiliation, this should be of major concern. Why? Because it means, somewhere in the upper echelon of the Federal Government there is a level of distrust so great, that it now threatens national security and stability. The corruption in DC may have gotten so far out of control that indeed the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has become weaponized by the current Executive Branch. I suspect this may be the case. Concluding by my own personal opinion on how the Biden/Harris "administration" viewed lockdowns (Covid19 economic restrictions and how those violated citizen freedoms) and how they have now given weapons (militarization) to tax collectors (IRS agents), it is a very valid argument, in my view, that they have likely deliberately used the FBI as their personal political army. Have political antics such as these, not been used in world history previously? Frankly, I see political parties as a threat to US Constitutional rights - most, simply lobby for big banks and corporate benefit. I personally admonish not to side with any (political party) and side with the United States Constitution. And, if you are active duty US military, you have taken an oath to defend it. However, recent trends in the DNC, clearly side my personal political philosophies and decisions with the majority of the members of the RNC. The August, 2022, Mar-a-Lago raid is rightfully equated to CIA type operations in such Latin-American countries as Honduras, Guatemala and/or Panama. Political climate results, typically known as Banana Republics. There is something to be learned about this from the Paraguayan Reductions in South America of the 1700's. These socialist theocratic templates likely influenced the socio-economic revolutionary philosophies of Karl Marx in the 1840's. All centralized religious governing tactics of continuing elements of the (former) Roman Empire. I write about these in my book: Freedom Reserved: NO MORE LIES. I will further suggest that these types of blatant acts of domestic disrespect show there to be a clear agenda to further divide and disrupt harmony in America. I predict that as this is currently happening to DC based federal agencies - this divide may soon be happening at the Pentagon level, if Americans do not ask more direct questions of government agencies. Distrust is where ground becomes incredibly treacherous. These divide and conquer type tactics are common in power-centralized governments such as Russia, China, Venezuela, Germany, North Korea and Cuba, for instance. Socialist policies lead to Communism. Banana Republic tactics are a breading ground.
America 2023: We seem to have two political agendas occupying the same geographical space. A dialectic. One that supports Israel (Trump) and one that supports the Pope and Rome (Biden). Thats how I currently view the dynamics and climate.
So, what is the Deep State? Israel driven? Rome driven? China or Russia driven? The United States as a country was founded on Judeo-Christian principles but, Rome has been at odds with Jerusalem for millennia. Has "Freedom of Religion" simply created a breeding ground for religious extremism? One thing is for sure - the Deep State is no ally to America and as I contend below, it simply wants to drive it extinction. Its main weapon? Debt.
"There are two ways to conquer and enslave a country. One is by the sword. The other is by debt."
2nd US President, John Adams. 1826
Regardless of the weapon being used, folks, make no mistake, Deep State tactics are systematic, well planned and highly sophisticated and protected. Hence, this is what I know. I declare, per my research, that the Federal Reserve (1913) is controlled (regulated) by the Bank of International Settlements - Basel, Switzerland and that the Vatican is primarily controlling this institution. I suspect, the socialist agenda of the FDR New Deal (1933) and its further economic development under Nixon (again abolishing the gold standard in '71)… brings today’s socialist agenda, now directed and implemented under Biden, to further fruition. It is the agenda of the controlling globalist order. That, that the World Economic Forum so well publicly administers. If the Central Banking mechanisms, globally, are regulated and therefore, controlled by the Bank of International Settlements (I may be wrong)... and that means, for instance, the Central Banks of: USA, England, China, Russia, France, and many others, than what is really simply happening internationally is an anti-Israel (socialist) agenda that has seemingly occupied DC and will completely make America subservient once it crashes the US $dollar. In the meantime, it financially and brilliantly creates battle enemies based off of pitting opposites against one another to economically dominate outcomes. Look no further than the political divide being created in the US: Democrats vs. Republicans. This is a Hegelian Dialectic based design. See Stanford's Antony Sutton for further clarification, here.
Early summer of 2022, I was in DC and went to the Library of Congress. Id listened to a report that the following had been torn out and replaced:
What the Texans left from the Mexican Union in 1836, economically, is the same centralized power monger that America is in a hidden struggle with today. This centralized, Socialist agenda, however, becomes increasingly apparent with each day. It is operated by a vastly powerful European banking conglomerate.
What is important is that no American put their religion or organizational faith ahead of their country regarding political decision. As example, Mexican politics, are still today influenced, overwhelmingly by a singular dominant religious belief. Catholicism.
Can a religious philosophy therefore, persuade mass theoretical thinking and decision making in a country? Yes. Use most any North or South American country established as a result of the Columbus voyages of the late 1490's. Mexican politics, for instance, are indeed an example of this, still today - despite their Constitution of 1857 and later adapted in 1917 that echo many elements of the US Constitution of 1787... mainly in this regard: freedom of religious practice - most Mexicans identify with the religious influences that developed their country. New Spain, today known as Mexico, is the oldest country in the New World. The William Travis lead army was in stark difference to the Santa Anna army members that assembled in San Antonio in February of 1836. These Mexican army members militarized along the philosophical formation paralleling those of their historical Spanish conquistadores - those rooted in a singular government ruled by a monarchy serving a singular religion. Catholicism. Pope.
When considering historical global powers, Rome has been around for well over 2000 years and modern London, for instance, well over 1000. However, Romans were likely in Londinium ("Londinio"), the first few decades AD. Athenian philosophy, the birthplace of democracy, has been influencing western thinking and politics for likely 3000 years. But, America... America is a child. Children are typically naive, comfortable and complacent - under-educated. This child has borrowed its name, likely from an Italian merchant, Amerigo Vespucci and certainly borrows the name for its banking center, New York, from England.. York, England. As you additionally read something else borrowed, their language. All good building blocks and parenting techniques can develop an incredible and productive adult... however, America's current political climate, may be showing some very dangerous elements of an inability to properly mature.
What must be protected are people's freedom to practice and conduct their religious beliefs peacefully. That means, Israel must be supported. Any American that works to do otherwise is therefore, breaching the laws of the Constitution. Has this Roman power (Vatican) see deeply infiltrated American politics, society and culture, that it now covertly takes aim at Israel through the Constitutional mechanics of the United States, her policies and her military? Therefore, is America simply becoming divided into two parties: one that supports her Constitution and backs Israeli freedoms and rights vs. one that stealthily attacks Israel from a hidden perch? That may very well be the development behind a Trump vs. Biden agenda. And as an American, you must demand answers immediately.
An estimated 65 Million Chinese died under the Mao Zedong dictatorship in China - this spanning from the inception of the CCP in 1921 to his death: September 9, 1976. The two main revolutionary episodes of atrocity occurring during 1) The Great Leap Forward - 1958 to 1962, that is estimated to have killed up to 55 million deaths and 2) The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution - 1966 - 1969 that killed an estimated 8 million Chinese. It was during this second episode that the Chairman abolished private citizen gun ownership in China (1966). This is a dictatorial systematic genocide greater than either Hitler or Stalin, folks. Socialist tactics have not proven effects anywhere globally. And we see here it leads to unnecessary repercussions.
So, if America has been invaded by a stealth enemy (as stated by Robert Spalding USAF on Discussions of Truth - April 20, 2020), where do these invasion tactics incept? They are not American. They do not represent the will of the US Constitution or its Republic. Where do they come from? Who's pulling the string? In 1966 this Chinese NWO puppet (Mao Zedung) abolished private gun ownership. Disarm a society and they have no means to fight back against tyranny. An engenious inner-country invasion war tactic. Yet, self-defense, a key component of the US Constitution.
From October 11, 1962 - December 8, 1965, inside Saint Pete's Basilica, Rome held what is known as the 2nd Vatican Ecumenical (whole body of churches) Counsel or: "Concilium Oecumenicum Vaticanum Secundum" in Latin. What is generally considered one of the deployed products of these meetings is something called "Liberation Theology". It is a theological approach to uplifting the socially downtrodden or oppressed. Think Marxism. Think Paraguayan Reduction systems of the mid-1700's. Think ingenious conquering tactic in the name of freedom, united under God... think big government centralization tactic.
The following San Francisco Socialist organization, as an example, boasts about the concept of Liberation Theology as a productive means of governing masses. However, their movement feeds right in to the Deep State mechanics of what I contend is a very well disguised, Holy Way… currently dominated by the Jesuit Order and its most major global road block: the US CONSTITUTION.
Liberation Theology is essentially a post WWII conquest brainchild of the Vatican. Primarily from Jesuits: Juan Luis Segundo and Jon Sobrino.
As you contemplate the research, consider: does a disarmed Republic (ie: overturned US 2nd Amendment) help liberate the people or simply strengthen the top percentage of its ruling class (government)... or in 1960's China's case, that of its dictator?
Allow me to narrow scope and trace influences, as I contend above, by continuing to follow historical steps. I always exhort that my readers and listeners "follow the money". So, lets do that:
America: A European Banking Puppet.
US first flag - The Grand Union Flag
In 1775, George Washington met with "The Professor" in Cambridge, MA. Who was this "professor" and what was he professing? Attending this meeting were Benjamin Franklin (committee chairman), Thomas Lynch and Benjamin Harrison. Continental Congress had authorized the "Flag Committee" to meet about adapting the first united colonial flag. As reported in Robert Allen Campbell's book: "Our Flag", this mysterious scholarly figure may not have been so strange at all. Washington and patriots needed funding for their war. Could it have been that this European based counselor figure may have represented said bankers? I commend, yes. Absolutely, possible.
It seems this elderly statesman from across the Atlantic, may have very well been a former prisoner of Castel Sant'Angelo and may have even gone so far as to fake his own death (see: F. Tupper Saussy below). That is open to deliberation. But what is known is that Washington et al, agreed to allow this European into the flag adaption committee. As mentioned in this Walter Veith video (suggested beginning at 1hr mark) - this adapted US Union flag may have very well come at the direction of Jesuit (Dr.) Lorenzo Ricci.
What is known is that Washington owned shares in the Bank of England. See: link
Does that surprise you? It should. Why would the national hero of America own shares of an enemy's bank? Simple: The Bank of England is largely controlled by a NON-ENGLISH entity. Therefore, not an "enemy". The Bank of England resides in what is known as the City of London. A sovereign and non-national entity (neighborhood) within London and is not formerly part of England or the United Kingdom. Whereas, The City of London represents the actual Crown. It controls the British monarchy. It finances the English government. The Queen (or King) must ask for permission to enter this banking district. Not the other way around. And this has stood as law since 1066 when William was unable to conquer it (the Bank). Again, the City of London represents the actual Crown... not the British crown.
So, where does this banking mechanism that Ronan Palan alluded to in this April 2019 episode of Discussions of Truth, come from? He clearly says that it is "mid-evil". The Normans conquered the aisles from an control of Anglo-Saxon era over Lodon (7th-11th centuries). Yet, indeed it was Rome that had established London dating back to at least 50AD. Therefore, the hyperbolic saying is that "All Roads Lead to Rome". The same is true in context of English history and its dependence on "other people's money".
In my opinion, which I have little to back up but the references listed here and further information located in the research section of my website; George Washington was somewhat if not largely financed by the City of London and thus, owned shares in its bank: The Bank of England. Therefore, when meeting to engineer design for such flag of Independence, the European banker's made clear that their money was well represented in such banner.
The first flag of what would become the United States Constitutional Republic is seen above.... as it flies of the City Hall of San Francisco. A city that my family has been in since 1916. 4 generations. Nancy D'Alesandro Pelosi was born in Baltimore, Maryland. Though her husband Paul is a SF native, I believe her to be more of a political plant than anything. This is simply my opinion. She seems like a very nice person. However, I have to see another similarity here in that Paul was educated at Georgetown. Yes, the same institution Bill Clinton received his education from - mainly under the tutelage of Carroll Quigley. Georgetown happens to be located aside Washington DC and yes, is America's oldest Jesuit university.
Lets get back to the flag. America's first flag clearly bears crosses. That of, what is seen in the British Grand Union Jack today. This United States' flag, clearly bears the crosses of: St. George (England), St. Andrew (Scotland) and St. Patrick (Ireland). As seen in the photos above and below. Outside of flag dimensions, the US Grand Union flag (America's first flag) is clearly the same flag as was used by the British East Indies Company. That includes having 13 stripes. So as the Mayflower sailed into Cape Code in 1620 and anchored in or around Nov 19 of that year, was Washington simply digressing and further corroding any progress that had been made by the passengers on that voyage? What I mean is this: those pilgrims, William Bradford (leader) and Christopher Jones (Captain) left the religious based tyrannic rule of the Church of England. Again: religion. Yet, Ive previously stated that William of Normandy was unable to conquer Rome's bank on Londinium (1066) from the Anglo-Saxons, and that, that bank, known as the City of London, has to this day remained sovereign and not a part of the United Kingdom. Whereas, the Church of England, though declaring itself separate from that church based in Rome, had always remained financially dependent on it - through the monarchy that ruled over it. Again, the British monarchy being subservient to The Bank (the City of London). Working on behalf of the entity or entities that financially controlled the British East Indies Trade Company, that had recently lost at least 340 chests of tea in what became a crisis in Boston Harbor 2 years prior (Boston Tea Party), had Lorenzo Ricci effectively essentially coerced Washington and company into Roman financial slavery?
There I saw a picture of Queen Elizabeth I and the flag of the East India Company of 1600 a.d., with its thirteen red and white horizontal stripes and its superimposed crosses in the upper corner. What astonished me was that this flag (which seemed to be the American flag) was apparently being used in 1600 a.d., 175 years before the American Revolution.” – Buckminster Fuller
Since Ive got your attention, allow me to direct you to a work of Jeremiah J. Crowley. The book: The Pope: Chief of White Slavers, goes into the notion of what I have just mentioned may have happened to America's founding fathers. That is, enslaving men, mainly white men, into a banking/funding system of debt. One fed by theological definition and belief. Religion. Another such work by author is titled: Romanism - A Menace to the Nation.
F. Tupper Saussy further mentions in his book that this "professor", that was in attendance at the Flag Committee meeting in Cambridge and yes, seemingly, being Lorenzo Ricci, the Superior General of the Society of Jesus (Jesuits); told Franklin and Washington the following:
“The Union Flag of the Mother Country is retained as the
union [upper left corner] of our new flag to announce that the
Colonies are loyal to the just and legitimate sovereignty of the
British Government. The thirteen stripes will at once be understood
to represent the thirteen Colonies; their equal width will
type the equal rank, rights and responsibilities of the Colonies.
The union of the stripes in the field of our flag will announce the
unity of interests and the cooperative union of efforts, which the
Colonies recognize and put forth in their common cause. The
white stripes will signify that we consider our demands just and
reasonable; and that we will seek to secure our rights through
peaceable, intelligent and statesmanlike means – if they prove
at all possible; and the red stripes at the top and bottom of our
flag will declare that first and last – and always – we have the
determination, the enthusiasm, and the power to use force –
whenever we deem force necessary. The alternation of the red
and white stripes will suggest that our reasons for all demands
will be intelligent and forcible, and that our force in securing our
rights will be just and reasonable.”
Furthermore, as John Paul Jones, aboard the Alfred along the shores of the Delaware in Philadelphia, on Dec 3, 1775 first hoisted this US Grand Union / British East Indies Company flag, was he simply forfeiting his independence without knowing it? I contend, that yes. The United States of America though having achieved its geographic independence, did not (and has not to this day - 2021) achieved its financial independence. Current national Federal debt: $28.9T (Nov 20, 2021).
So who was Lorenzo Ricci and why is it proposed that his identity may have been suppressed during this meeting with Franklin and Washington in October of 1775. Ricci was the 18th Superior General of the Society of Jesus. The Jesuits are known as "God's Marine's". They are a military order of the Vatican. So allow me to further explain what I know about the power-structure inside the Vatican.
What is of immediate interest now is that today in 2021, there are considered by many, to be 3 popes. A white pope, a black pope and a grey pope. My understanding is that the white pope is the public figure. The official spokes-person, if you will, of the Vatican. That is one Jorge Mario Bergoglio... or Pope Francis. An Argentinian and not of the Franciscan Order. He is a Jesuit. The black pope is one Arturo Marcelino Sosa Abascal. A Venezuelan. He heads the shadow military order for the Vatican. The Jesuits. And, Pepe Orsini, being the grey pope. He comes from the banking family: House of Orsini. Pepe's lineage includes that of 5 popes: Stephen II (752-757), Paul I (757-767), Celestine III (1191–1198), Nicholas III (1277–1280), and Benedict XIII (1724–1730). But, lets stay with Ricci here. Founded in 1540 by Ignatius of Loyola, this Army of God was organized to suppress the protestant movement in Europe under the crown of Leo X (House of Medici). To counter reformation. See the Council of Trent. Martin Luther would pass away in 1546. The Mayflower pilgrims of 1620 a product of this reformation, in essence. Protestantism. Could Lorenzo have been present in 1775, and if so, was he acting as discrete military agent for the Society of Jesus? Well, yes, that is clear. There is no doubt. What is more important is the fact that Washington (assuming the assertion is accurate - that "the professor" indeed was Ricci) complied with this European statesman and adapted this British East Indies Company flag as the banner for the "free world". The origin of the “star-spangled banner" (not cross spangled) was adopted later on June 14, 1777. Again, I assert, that the "free world" was perhaps geographically free... but, certainly not financially free. Ricci, a Vatican agent, was acting as an ambassador for the bank which his company represented: The City of London. The British East Indies Company acting on behalf of the monarchy, which represented the people of Britain, yet, we know, simply only subservient to and doing the bidding of, the Roman bank that manipulated its governance: again, The City of London via the Bank of England. Follow the money through all roads that lead to Rome. You'll find yourself walking through Switzerland along the way.
Let us now, remember The Alamo. Ok. Take a breath. Throughout global affairs, especially those that we identify as being in and of "the West", we know that Rome has remained a constant. A power, though physically un-dominant but, non the less, a power. A strong and manipulative power since, basically, having conquered Greece starting in 218BC involving Hannibal in the Punic Wars. A power based on theory. Again, a theological power. Theres that theory word. Conspiracy. Yet, we have a solid tangible organization that has massive global influence and therefore power BASED on THEORY. WOW!
So... March 06, 1836. Texas. The Texans had declared their independence from Mexico. Mexico, still working with the highly corrupt government it had inherited from the Spanish. The Spanish having conquered lands in the New World under the order of Papal Bull Inter Caetera of 1493. That is the right, according to "God" to conquer (half - Portugal was granted the other half) the world in the name of religion. Therefore, the Mexicans, whom I have spent many wonderful days of my life alongside, spend centuries paying taxes and tithes into a corrupt government (based on religion) that fed back to the Spanish crown yet, ultimately not into Spain but, Italy... and into the Vatican. Another, like the City of London, banking machine that is sovereign (independent) from Roma and Italia. Same bank? Yes.
Santa Ana, of course, working for the Mexican government which remained closely nit to the Vatican (via Spain) fought those Texan efforts of Independence and regained possession of The Alamo. Why is this important? Because the Texas Republic was aided by President James Polk and American sympathizers. Protestors. Hence, America, you lost that insugency battle. A month later, April 21, 1836, Sam Houston and army would successfully defeat Santa Ana's troops and officially declare independence for Texas. This set the stage for the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo to be signed in 1848 in large part due to US Marines having stormed the Halls of Montezuma (Battle of Chapultepec - 1847) via the leadership of General Winfield Scott in Mexico City. This treaty essentially formed the US boundary upon what is along the Rio Grande River.
Whereas folks, the same colonial swamp rats that the Mayflower left Europe from, are actively invading the DC swamp today. Realizing, of course, that their great “communist” package of equality in governance, invaded your Independence Hall officially during the Obama Administration. 26 September 2015. In the guise of socialistic conveniences for governing a civilization. Obama Administration. Universal healthcare? Not a bad concept… if the bank controlling it was run for and by The People. Not so with the Federal Reserve Central Bank. 1913.
“The US Federal Reserve Central Bank is un•Constitutional and needs to be repealed!”
- FL Rep Antony Sabatini
Discussions of Truth
To my knowledge, it was the first time in American history the Supreme Pontiff step foot inside the historic birthplace of America. Why is this unique? Because America is founded on protestantism. Period. The freedom to practice and define religion freely. Protestng the religious monopoly out of Rome.
Allow me to revisit Mao Zedong here briefly. Regarding the philosophical invasion and military tactics of Sun Tsu, Matteo Ricci was the Vatican's Superior General of China from 1582 - 1610. The Jesuits had arrived to the far east via the Portuguese settlement Macau. Ricci gained entrance here. He died in Beijing in 1610. Granted the Jesuits are a military order of the Vatican and have a purpose to invade and conquer via education and economy, it is well surmised, that Zedong could have indeed simply have been a political and economic puppet to accomplish these Marxist-Lenonist conquest goals.
Art critique: The controversy is that this painting of Mao Zedong was actually painted by one Luigi Carnevali and was hung inside the Vatican pressroom. The opposing side via Wikipedia states that it was painter by Lui Chunhua in 1967 as “Chairman Mao en Route to Anyuan”. Is Communism a ROMAN war tactic? The "Art of War" is deception.
A largely understood communist sympathizer, Obama perhaps, not knowing what he may have been doing by graciously allowing the Crown (of thorns) into America’s cradle. For it was Peter Beckx, the 22nd Supreme-General of the Society of Jesus in 1853 who is considered to have counciled Karl Marx (notice another “x”), in the writing of Das Kapital at the British Museum, London. Bizmark kicked both Marx and the Jesuits out of Germany. Consider this Marx interview published by the Chicago Tribune - 1879 in regards: link
We add to the globalist angle of control, lest I remind you, perhaps you are unaware, but Catolicism literally means: universal. Whereas this is the etymology or the Greek meaning if “katholikos”. I am not saying it is either a good nor bad thing. I am simply pointing out some historic relevancies in regards.
So, now let me revisit that above video by Walter Veith. There you will find ample evidence for the Jesuit influence in the writing of Sun Tsu’s Art of War.
Was deception something “The Professor” was practicing when he met with Franklin and Washington in Cambridge? Philosophically it seems the approach, was lockstep with those of the practices of a Jesuit crusade.
The Art of War was “translated” by Frenchman Jean Joseph Marie Amiot in 1772. Just a few years prior to 1775. As it happens, Amiot was a Jesuit. Veith makes a great argument that Tsu is simply a ficticious character and created in large part to develop a deceptive story. One that might philosphically and theoretically create a culture of dominance… or an ability to be dominated… or subjegated.
So now, we get to vaccines and mandates on you human health. We arrive to something called the Protocols of Zion. Let's first consider the imbalance and disturbance currently facing our homeland. To repeat: Brigadier General Robert Spalding III, USAF, said on my program, "America has been invaded by a Stealth Enemy." Robert said this on April 22, 2020: link. Taken that into consideration, what is this symbolism on the logo of the CIA. The CIA is often referred to as "The Company". A company like the former British East Indies Company? Quite possibly. But, what we do know is this... if the CIA (established in 1947 after WWII... 2 years after China adopted a Central Bank (1945) and that same year as being when the United Nations had been chartered in San Francisco (1945); indeed does bear this Jesuit symbol upon its logo - we know this; that IHS (a Jesuit motto) means In Hoc Signo (vinces). “By this sign, thou shalt conquer”. See Constantine The Great.
What does the Society of Jesus, "God's Army" have anything to do with vaccines in 2021? The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. Many consider this to be a Jewish led group. I contest that it is not Jewish and that it is connected to the Club of Rome and is by and large ran by the Sons of Ignatius of Loyola. Therefore Israel, as we know it today, as being officially independent from British rule (1948) is a historical product of the Balfour Declaration of 1917 authored by Walter Rothschild, Arhur Balfour, Leo Amery and Lord Milner. Furthermore, its 1954 established Central bank makes it essentially under the economic control of the same entity or entities that control the Jesuit Order. Yes, Rome. Remember Switzerland and the Bank of International Settlements in Basel. For it is the Swiss (yes, Swiss) Pontifical Guard that protects The Pope. Established in 1506, their patron happens to be Ignatius of Loyola.
J. Edgard Hoover was well aware of these protocols. Un-classified documents clearly show this: link
An additional example of IHS or "by this sign, ye shall conquer" is seen, in my opinion, in the logos of the NSA. Above clearly the birds are clutching keys. Translated, again, in my opinion, of the power and control that the Vatican portrays in a border transpiring display of conquest. The Holy See Coat of Arms clearly displays both keys together. The silver key symbolizing the "Pope's" temporal affairs (earthly power) and the gold key symbolic of the "Pope's" terrestrial affairs (spiritual or heavenly power). The Vatican City State was modernly founded officially in 1929 via the Lateran Treaty (11 February) and said Coat of Arms was adapted. This happens to be the same year America's Great Depression began.
I was recently in DC and went to the Library of Congress to investigate a related topic of curiosity.
I had seen that author Bill Hughes contended that the "Jesuit 4th Vow - Blood Oath" as stated in:
62nd Congress. 3rd Session. United States Congressional Record. House Calendar No. 1532. February 15, 1913. Pgs 3215 - 3216, had been "torn out". I went look for myself.
Sure enough, something had been replaced. The page was clearly not original.
To further this Rome vs. Israel angle, interesting enough, I have had a recent Y ouT ube video removed of an interview Id done with Jexist… saying it was against their company policy.
What are widely considered to be a hoax, are The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. Published in 1903, I assert that they are far from hoax and indeed are a religious based goal of global dominion. Anti-American and certainly un-Constitutional. Yet, its tentacles stretching far into American culture and society. Hence, the art of war is deception.
"To Attain our Ends we must foment trouble in all countries, utterly exhaust all humanity with dissensions, hatreds, struggles, envies, torture, starvation and THE INOCULATION of DIESEASES..."
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, Dr. Judy Mikovitz and many others are clearly stating that these pandemic vaccines are not vaccinations by definition. Therefore, they are injections and/or inoculations. Could it be that there is a system, an organization, a global infrastructure that is so well sophisticated and organized that it could develop and inserts its objectives upon the global masses? This would be the ultimate stealth enemy. This would be the creation of the ultimate Trojan Horse. Accept the research or not, this sure seems to add-up to me.
According to author Eric John Phelps, prior guest on Discussions of Truth, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion were written in France as a result of the Dryfus Affair and published in Russian in 1903. This prior to the Bolshevik Revolution. He quotes L.H. Lehmann:
You clearly read there that the Jesuit Order, 100 years prior to these Protocols released in 1903, created a similar deceptive movement against Jansenism with the release of The Secrets of the Elders of Bourg-Fontaine. So, lets get back to Protocol 10 which I have posted for you above. Remember to browse the un-classified FBI documents on their official .gov site. Therefore, if Phelps is correct that Lehmann is accurate in his assessment, the Jesuits, which I contend have been infiltrating the US government since, at least, 1775 by flying their banking flag over Philadelphia - are a direct line to the eye that is behind what some are calling a "plandemic" .
I leave you considering “inoculations” with the most recent episode of Discussions of Truth. Guest: Siphiwe Baleka. An African-American who has compiled the most impressive and extensive research of medical virus/injection malpractice of the past 100 years that I have come across to date. Baleka is a graduate of Yale University. His work: link.
I also urge you to consider this book by Eustace Mullins: Murder by Injection - The Story of Medical Conspiracy Against America. Link
America: its time to recall your identity. Remember, what you are founded upon. If you understand the importance of Freedom of Religion and the other liberal and free rights granted to you via the US Constitution, it is time. Time is now. Whether at your place of work. Whether at your place of study or whether at your place of worship, it is time. Time for you to stand up and let your voice be heard.
Let me mention to you this: it was under the administration of Ronald Reagan that the United States had established official recent relations with the Vatican and for those of you who may believe Fox News to be delivering you "Fair and Balanced" trustworthy information, consider this: Rupert Murdoch (an Australian) was knighted by Pope JPII and received a Knighthood of St. Gregory in 1998.
Rethink, what you currently think. Do not allow an agency to limit or define your religion. Do not be deceived.
“We live in a Socialist society. To eliminate freedom, one must eliminate wide-spread knowledge of the truth.”
America, take off your masks. Fight against division and any type of theory. Oppose mandates on vaccinations. Recall your brave and noble history - remember where your flag came from as you Remember: The Alamo.
Discussions of Truth
The video to the left is a 2hr segment I did with the gentlemen at EarthRadioNetwork. In this episode I discuss the above article.