There I saw a picture of Queen Elizabeth I and the flag of the East India Company of 1600 a.d., with its thirteen red and white horizontal stripes and its superimposed crosses in the upper corner. What astonished me was that this flag (which seemed to be the American flag) was apparently being used in 1600 a.d., 175 years before the American Revolution.” – Buckminster Fuller
Since Ive got your attention, allow me to direct you to a work of Jeremiah J. Crowley. The book: The Pope: Chief of White Slavers, goes into the notion of what I have just mentioned may have happened to America's founding fathers. That is, enslaving men, mainly white men, into a banking/funding system of debt. One fed by theological definition and belief. Religion. Another such work by author is titled: Romanism - A Menace to the Nation.
F. Tupper Saussy further mentions in his book that this "professor", that was in attendance at the Flag Committee meeting in Cambridge and yes, seemingly, being Lorenzo Ricci, the Superior General of the Society of Jesus (Jesuits); told Franklin and Washington the following:
“The Union Flag of the Mother Country is retained as the
union [upper left corner] of our new flag to announce that the
Colonies are loyal to the just and legitimate sovereignty of the
British Government. The thirteen stripes will at once be understood
to represent the thirteen Colonies; their equal width will
type the equal rank, rights and responsibilities of the Colonies.
The union of the stripes in the field of our flag will announce the
unity of interests and the cooperative union of efforts, which the
Colonies recognize and put forth in their common cause. The
white stripes will signify that we consider our demands just and
reasonable; and that we will seek to secure our rights through
peaceable, intelligent and statesmanlike means – if they prove
at all possible; and the red stripes at the top and bottom of our
flag will declare that first and last – and always – we have the
determination, the enthusiasm, and the power to use force –
whenever we deem force necessary. The alternation of the red
and white stripes will suggest that our reasons for all demands
will be intelligent and forcible, and that our force in securing our
rights will be just and reasonable.”
Furthermore, as John Paul Jones, aboard the Alfred along the shores of the Delaware in Philadelphia, on Dec 3, 1775 first hoisted this US Grand Union / British East Indies Company flag, was he simply forfeiting his independence without knowing it? I contend, that yes. The United States of America though having achieved its geographic independence, did not (and has not to this day - 2021) achieved its financial independence. Current national Federal debt: $28.9T (Nov 20, 2021).
So who was Lorenzo Ricci and why is it proposed that his identity may have been suppressed during this meeting with Franklin and Washington in October of 1775. Ricci was the 18th Superior General of the Society of Jesus. The Jesuits are known as "God's Marine's". They are a military order of the Vatican. So allow me to further explain what I know about the power-structure inside the Vatican.
What is of immediate interest now is that today in 2021, there are considered by many, to be 3 popes. A white pope, a black pope and a grey pope. My understanding is that the white pope is the public figure. The official spokes-person, if you will, of the Vatican. That is one Jorge Mario Bergoglio... or Pope Francis. An Argentinian and not of the Franciscan Order. He is a Jesuit. The black pope is one Arturo Marcelino Sosa Abascal. A Venezuelan. He heads the shadow military order for the Vatican. The Jesuits. And, Pepe Orsini, being the grey pope. He comes from the banking family: House of Orsini. Pepe's lineage includes that of 5 popes: Stephen II (752-757), Paul I (757-767), Celestine III (1191–1198), Nicholas III (1277–1280), and Benedict XIII (1724–1730). But, lets stay with Ricci here. Founded in 1540 by Ignatius of Loyola, this Army of God was organized to suppress the protestant movement in Europe under the crown of Leo X (House of Medici). To counter reformation. See the Council of Trent. Martin Luther would pass away in 1546. The Mayflower pilgrims of 1620 a product of this reformation, in essence. Protestantism. Could Lorenzo have been present in 1775, and if so, was he acting as discrete military agent for the Society of Jesus? Well, yes, that is clear. There is no doubt. What is more important is the fact that Washington (assuming the assertion is accurate - that "the professor" indeed was Ricci) complied with this European statesman and adapted this British East Indies Company flag as the banner for the "free world". The origin of the “star-spangled banner" (not cross spangled) was adopted later on June 14, 1777. Again, I assert, that the "free world" was perhaps geographically free... but, certainly not financially free. Ricci, a Vatican agent, was acting as an ambassador for the bank which his company represented: The City of London. The British East Indies Company acting on behalf of the monarchy, which represented the people of Britain, yet, we know, simply only subservient to and doing the bidding of, the Roman bank that manipulated its governance: again, The City of London via the Bank of England. Follow the money through all roads that lead to Rome. You'll find yourself walking through Switzerland along the way.
Let us now, remember The Alamo. Ok. Take a breath. Throughout global affairs, especially those that we identify as being in and of "the West", we know that Rome has remained a constant. A power, though physically un-dominant but, non the less, a power. A strong and manipulative power since, basically, having conquered Greece starting in 218BC involving Hannibal in the Punic Wars. A power based on theory. Again, a theological power. Theres that theory word. Conspiracy. Yet, we have a solid tangible organization that has massive global influence and therefore power BASED on THEORY. WOW!
So... March 06, 1836. Texas. The Texans had declared their independence from Mexico. Mexico, still working with the highly corrupt government it had inherited from the Spanish. The Spanish having conquered lands in the New World under the order of Papal Bull Inter Caetera of 1493. That is the right, according to "God" to conquer (half - Portugal was granted the other half) the world in the name of religion. Therefore, the Mexicans, whom I have spent many wonderful days of my life alongside, spend centuries paying taxes and tithes into a corrupt government (based on religion) that fed back to the Spanish crown yet, ultimately not into Spain but, Italy... and into the Vatican. Another, like the City of London, banking machine that is sovereign (independent) from Roma and Italia. Same bank? Yes.
Santa Ana, of course, working for the Mexican government which remained closely nit to the Vatican (via Spain) fought those Texan efforts of Independence and regained possession of The Alamo. Why is this important? Because the Texas Republic was aided by President James Polk and American sympathizers. Protestors. Hence, America, you lost that insugency battle. A month later, April 21, 1836, Sam Houston and army would successfully defeat Santa Ana's troops and officially declare independence for Texas. This set the stage for the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo to be signed in 1848 in large part due to US Marines having stormed the Halls of Montezuma (Battle of Chapultepec - 1847) via the leadership of General Winfield Scott in Mexico City. This treaty essentially formed the US boundary upon what is along the Rio Grande River.
Whereas folks, the same colonial swamp rats that the Mayflower left Europe from, are actively invading the DC swamp today. Realizing, of course, that their great “communist” package of equality in governance, invaded your Independence Hall officially during the Obama Administration. 26 September 2015. In the guise of socialistic conveniences for governing a civilization. Obama Administration. Universal healthcare? Not a bad concept… if the bank controlling it was run for and by The People. Not so with the Federal Reserve Central Bank. 1913.