"This is an amazing article." 

- Jeff Zink, US Congressional candidate.  AZ,  3rd District. 

Hegelian Dialectic - creating political opposites in a nation. 

A few years ago Discussions of Truth co-interviewed historian and theologian Eric John Phelps.   From that time with Phelps I went on to investigate a bit more about how he defined the "Deep State".  Early on in my own research after being exposed to the "ZIKA virus" in Miami Beach of 2016, I started studying former Stanford Hoover fellow, Antony Sutton.   Hegelian Dialectic was one thing that stuck with me over the years.  That is, "controlling the opposites to dominate the nature of the outcome".   Sound like US politics today?   Controlling opposites.   First you've got to create opposites (a 2 party system).  Then you control it  economically (skyrocketing deficit - to a point of no return).   Sutton wrote extensively about the corruption in Wall Street and the Federal Reserve Bank.  Phelps, took a theological angle, rooting corruption in DC to the religious struggles of the early founders of New England... and those still existing today.  America at its root of existence is a Protestant nation.   Could combing the two make sense (theology and economics)?   It makes sense if the American invader runs a communist agenda. That is:  a bank controlling American theology through politics.   The early stages of this invasion tactic took place in what is known as: The Paraguayan Jesuit Reduction system.  A network of Christian communities established by the Jesuits in the early 17th century to protect and evangelize indigenous Guaraní people in South America.

Objectively,  yes - their goal is centralized  dictation.   Essentially, therefore, today, if DC was controlled by the regulatory policies of the Federal Reserve, and if (it) was essentially controlled by a foreign entity: the City of London (which controls the Bank of England... yet not technically part of England - it is its own sovereign nation), then who controls the City of London?  My research shows that it is essentially controlled by various Roman entities that are tied to the Vatican.  This today through the post WWI (1930) creation called the Bank of International Settlements of Basel, Switzerland.  Those of you in Miami should be thinking, yes, Art Basel.  Rome: therefore, population control through theology.  If all of this is true, and indeed, "All roads lead to Rome" than, the Reagan years were a major conquest for the Vatican.  

Note: The Bank of International Settlements regulates all central banks globally.  Those include the US Federal Reserve, the City of London/Bank of England, the Russian and Chinese central banks.  

Let me make a few important points before moving forward.  

1. Regarding the Rome connection... it seems many roads lead to an important group called the Club of Rome.  This is club would seem to have a global motivation to control the world through its econmics and media.  Controlling the education systems of otherwise independent countries would seem to run through the military order of the Society of Jesus (In French, known as the Jesuits).  The Club of Rome has presumably beomce an oligarchy that controls most of the world as we experience it, right now. Trade-routes, technology, etc..  I may be innacurate in that statement but, that is what I have learned. 

The Catholic church has already been destroyed from within. The papal office was recently occupied by a Jesuit named Francis.  It is now occupied by an American named Leo.  As was recently put to me: "It's leaders today are satanic, not devout worshipers of Christ through Peter's church."  I leave that up to you (the reader) to decipher and opine.   The source of mine continues to exclaim: "it (Vatican) exists for its banking business more than saving souls." 

Now, the multi party system in America has turned into an obvious 2 party system.  Free voices are no longer heard.  They are forced into one of the sides of the dialectic (Democrats vs Republican).  What they dont understand, as far as Im concerned, is that, that is by design.  Again, see Hegil.  Furthermore, they are simply following the zeitgeist of the monopolistic central banking system.  Therefore, DC politics have become nothing more than a Uni-banking-party.  Elon Musk recently said the Fed Gov is now "unfixable".  He is calling for further divide.  Propelling a conflict.  I disagree. The enemy must be identified.  The enemy is not the US government.  It is not the Constitution.  The enemy is a foreign entity that has invaded our Republic.  That must be identified and removed.  Not permitted to operate on our shores.  This is a hidden organization that operates in the shadows.  

Israel.  Subject to a central bank.  The Bank of Israel.  A Rothschild banking organization.  All central banks seemingly run through the BIS (Bank of International Settlements).  Israel and its government is not a threat to American independence.  The Federal Reserve central bank would seem to be. But, more importantly that global regulatory body that appears to regulate it and all central banks globally... that includes the Bank of Israel.  

My current train of thought is that to truly make America great again, it must certainly retain a closed border.  It must return all manufacturing into its borders.  It must also re-group the national education system and adjust its culture to strengthen national pride.  But, more importantly, to make it independent from this globalist operation/cabal, it must withdraw from the UN and abolish the 1913 Federal Reserve Act. It must stop getting involved in these global wars that use its military as their (globalist) proxy.  

So, what could this Deep State mechanism look like?  I say that the enemy of the protestant culture the country was founded on in1776 will take you down the avenue to shed direct light on that answer.  The world, in other words, has changed very little in 250 years. 

From 1867 to 1984, the US government had abolished diplomatic ties with the Vatican.   Reagan re-established them.   Quote (source):  

The United States maintained consular relations with the Vatican from 1797 to 1848, after which it entered into full diplomatic relations for 20 years.

But in 1867, Congress barred the use of federal funds to continue those relations in response to a move in Italy to reunite the independent Papal States with the rest of the country. Since 1870, the Vatican had consisted only of the 108 acres that serve as the headquarters of the Roman Catholic Church.

As a city-state, Vatican City in 1983 had fewer than 1,000 citizens; it nonetheless issued its own license plates and postage stamps.

Furthermore, consider the Covid years and the strong anti-vax movement.  It was under Reagan that the Vaccine Injury Act was passed.  That Act protects Big Pharma from being sued.  Since, Im hitting out to left field right now for some of you, let me quickly visit the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion (1903).   According to Leo H Lehmann the Elders of Zion are a Jesuit created facade created to govern Israel (think: Balfour Declaration of 1917).  Hence, the Learned Elders are not Jewish. Protocol 10 calls for the "innoculation of diseases" to the masses.  Was Covid and its vaccine(s) man-made?  If so, to who's agenda do the efforts align?  

Prior to getting back to Reagan, let me broaden the scope a bit and introduce the UN into discussion.  

Now consider this:  the USA was invaded decades ago by a foreign government. So sophisticated they are actually not a “government”.  Its called the United Nations.  If the above banking connection is true, Rome has used Switzerland as an identity shelter to persuade economic political action in (protestant based) governments.   Is that inflitration showing its fruits in American politics today?  According to Phelps, yes.  The UN has essentially a communist agenda - that is, leading by all administrative power on top and a very small middle ground (class), with the masses acting and following accordingly.  

Reagan. 

Americans today essentially have 2 sides from which to politically choose from.  This is by design.  Hegelian Dialectic.  Reagan, a former Democract (like Trump), became a staunch conservative representing the Republican party.  In 2015 I went to pre-candidacy Trump rallies in Miami where I heard him (Donald Trump) state that if he ran for President he would do so as an independent and self-financed.  I supported (I was age 16) Ross Perot in 1992 for US President.  What changed with Trump in 2016?  The super-pac money of the RNC.  

So, if ALL the above are accurate and the Roman empire is essentially paying the electric bill that keeps the Statue of Liberty's torch lit, then, the USA has all but been physically conquered by Rome.  If and when that happens, don't expect to be speaking Italian.  They will use any number of their proxy military powers to rule you (ie: England, China or Russia).  By and large, and this is for a different conversation, they used English as their first proxy.  Yes, this is a discussion for the term illuminati, which, it seems Washington and the founders may have been subservient to.  The "enlightened ones" are historically a Bavarian based invasive society.  Be it, an espionage group.  Find more here. 

The following article sites Jesuit whistleblower Alberto Rivera and American theologian Bill Hughes.  It essentially explains the signs demonstrating that the Vatican had captured the US flag by getting Reagan elected through the national work of controlling protestantism.  Was Reagan aware of such conspiracy and fraud?  I highly doubt it.  He, like Trump, were/are simply hard working men that want America first.  MAGA.  The last person to tug at their (the Deep State) purse strings got his head blown off in Dallas at Dealey Plaza.  RIP JFK.  

The Sign when every Protestant denomination had been successfully infiltrated and overcome by the Jesuits

Monday September 27, 2010

Alberto Rivera is an ex-Jesuit priest who offers some very valuable insight in to apostasy of the Protestant churches of today. He carried out many evil deeds for the Jesuit Order. However, he responded to the leading of the Holy Spirit and left the Jesuits and became a follower of the Lord, Jesus Christ. While some of his understandings of Scripture were not correct, Rivera was very clear on the role of the Jesuits and the Vatican in history. Eventually, Rivera died a martyr, having been poisoned by the Jesuits. Rivera discussed the Jesuits’ desire to infiltrate and takeover all Protestant churches and lead them to follow the papacy. He stated that a sign would be given to Jesuits worldwide when every Protestant denomination had been successfully infiltrated and overcome by the Jesuits.

The sign was to be when a President of the U.S. took his oath of office facing an obelisk. For the first time in U.S. history, the swearing in ceremonies were moved to the West front of the capitol, and President Ronald Reagan faced the Washington-Monument. This happened January 20, 1981. -- Jack Chick, The Godfathers, Alberto Part Three, Chick Publications, page 26.

Some may think that Alberto does not know what he is talking about.

They probably believe that their church has not been taken over by the Jesuits. Consider this:

1. Is your church still protesting against the tyranny of the papacy?

2. Does your church still teach that the papacy is the anti-Christ, or is it, or is it something that your church once taught, but now shies away from because it is not politically correct?

3. Does your church engage in celebration style church services that are more contemporary with the times and have more upbeat music? This was part of the papacy’s plan at Vatican II in taking over all the churches.

4. Is your church forgetting their historic teachings and becoming more modern, casting away the old truths as relics of the past?

5. Are your church periodicals finding more and more good things to say about the papacy, even considering the Vatican leaders to be fine Christian people?

6. Is your church willing to join the ecumenical movement, even if it means sacrificing some basic teachings or principles that the church once believed?

If you can answer yes to one or more of these questions, or yes to all of these questions, then Alberto Rivera is right. Are there any major religious bodies or denominations today that don’t meet these criteria?

.

The Enemy Unmasked, Bill Hughes, pp.149-150.

LINK TO ORIGINAL ARTICLE

I don't care what religion you may affiliate with or practice.  I don't care if you are agnostic or atheist.  What I care about is the US Constitution.  I care about health freedom.  I care about the longevity of the United States of America.  I furthmore care about history and understanding it in order to prevent future tyranny.  If the findings above are correct, allow this article to serve as warning to a country in danger of collapse. 

Ronald Reagan, by all things considered for America, was an outstanding President.  Did he dig enough to root out corruption in DC, absolutely not.  But, he did make America great and certainly made it a better place for Americans to be proud of.   It is now up to us to right the damage that has been done and truly make America an independent beacon of hope, freedom, liberty and justice for ALL.   

Please donate to my work and writings